Yes, at the next reload but not until then. But.if you have frame-relay
maps, you don't need to in-arp for the address anymore.
Thank you,
MikeN
""Sasa Milic"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> And then static map will kill InARP, wouldn't it ?
>
> Sasa
>
>
> M
And then static map will kill InARP, wouldn't it ?
Sasa
Marc Russell wrote:
>
> You don't need a routing protocol to ping a directly connected neighbor ip
> address on the same subnet. Inverse arp should of taken care of the layer-2
> to layer-3 mapping. As for your own interface add a frame m
You don't need a routing protocol to ping a directly connected neighbor ip
address on the same subnet. Inverse arp should of taken care of the layer-2
to layer-3 mapping. As for your own interface add a frame map command for
your own interface and it will work.
Marc Russell
www.ccbootcamp.com
"
I was doing one of the frame relay labs from Hutnik's CCIE lab books and did
not understand the following:-
1. Why is it that I could only ping from Router-A to Router-B and
vice-versa, but can not ping their own interfaces?
2. Why is the routing protocol (RIP in this case) configured on Route
4 matches
Mail list logo
