RE: HSRP and subnets [7:52991]

2002-09-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
enabled wrote: > > I didn't mean to scare anyone with the bizarre addressing. > Maybe I went a > little overboard while trying to create an extreme situation. No problem. ;-) More below... > > I have not done HSRP in some time and I got confused by > likening HSRP peers > to IPSec or ISAKMP pe

RE: HSRP and subnets [7:52991]

2002-09-10 Thread enabled
I didn't mean to scare anyone with the bizarre addressing. Maybe I went a little overboard while trying to create an extreme situation. I have not done HSRP in some time and I got confused by likening HSRP peers to IPSec or ISAKMP peers (where peer IP addresses can be specified). I had forgott

RE: HSRP and subnets [7:52991]

2002-09-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
enabled wrote: > > Is there a rule stating that addresses in a HSRP group need to > be in the > same subnet? > > For example can I have 2 devices with the following addresses: > RouterA: 10.10.10.1 > RouterB: 172.16.10.1 > HSRP address: 192.168.10.1 What problem are you trying to solve? Haven't

Re: HSRP and subnets [7:52991]

2002-09-10 Thread John Neiberger
HSRP is used when two or more routers share interfaces on the same LAN subnet. The LAN interface IP addresses and the HSRP addresses must all be in the same subnet unless you're purposefully trying to create some bizarre behavior. John >>> "enabled" 9/10/02 8:59:30 AM >>> Is there a rule stati

HSRP and subnets [7:52991]

2002-09-10 Thread enabled
Is there a rule stating that addresses in a HSRP group need to be in the same subnet? For example can I have 2 devices with the following addresses: RouterA: 10.10.10.1 RouterB: 172.16.10.1 HSRP address: 192.168.10.1 Thanks, Sam Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=