Re: HSRP configuration

2001-01-30 Thread Kirk Bollinger
Avenue, 14th Floor > > New York, NY. 10017 > > 646-562-6540 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Jim Healis > > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:47 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > S

Re: HSRP configuration

2001-01-30 Thread Jim Healis
Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: HSRP configuration > > > What about physical port failure? Or cable failure (i.e. gets yanked > out by an idiot)? > That's the kind of failure I was thinking of when I mentioned the single > p

RE: HSRP configuration

2001-01-30 Thread Brant Stevens
: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP configuration What about physical port failure? Or cable failure (i.e. gets yanked out by an idiot)? That's the kind of failure I was thinking of when I mentioned the single point. Brant Stevens wrote: > Why no

HSRP configuration

2001-01-30 Thread Jim Healis
For those that have used HSRP in your networks for redundant external connections, how have you dealt with the "single point of failure" issue when you have two routers, two switches and using ISL to run HSRP between them? I have two 7206VXR routers, two Cat 6509 switches. My current drawing

Re: HSRP configuration

2001-01-30 Thread Jim Healis
On Behalf Of > Jim Healis > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 2:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: HSRP configuration > > > For those that have used HSRP in your networks for redundant external > connections, how have you dealt with the "single point of failure"

RE: HSRP configuration

2001-01-30 Thread Brant Stevens
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Healis Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HSRP configuration For those that have used HSRP in your networks for redundant external connections, how have you dealt with the "single point of failure&q