-L post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Bartlett, DS1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: High collision rate on 2600 ethernet port
>Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 08:24:52 -0400
>
>I have 6 Bay Accelars and 190 Baystack 450's into both a Cisco 7507
y 16, 2000 12:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: High collision rate on 2600 ethernet port
>
> I was curious if anyone else had seen this.
> We have a 2600 with 2 T1's going to other sights. The
> ethernet port connects it to a Bay 450 10/100 switch.
> Both swit
collision rate on 2600 ethernet port
I was curious if anyone else had seen this.
We have a 2600 with 2 T1's going to other sights. The
ethernet port connects it to a Bay 450 10/100 switch.
Both switch and router ports are set to 10 / half, but
we're st
It appears that have a pretty high utilization rate on that 10MB port. It's running
close to 35% in that example, which is very high for 10Mb, half duplex. If you have a
2620 or 2621, set the ethernet port to full duplex.
Then again, now that I think about it, the collision rate, in this case
I was curious if anyone else had seen this.
We have a 2600 with 2 T1's going to other sights. The
ethernet port connects it to a Bay 450 10/100 switch.
Both switch and router ports are set to 10 / half, but
we're still seeing a collision rate of about 19% This seems
pretty high to me. Anyone ha
5 matches
Mail list logo
