I'm reposting this in the hopes that someone who didn't see it before might
have some ideas about this. Heck, SWAGs, educated guesstimates, or
telephone psychic impressions are also welcome. We are completely stumped
about how to resolve this. I've even posted this question on the CCO Q&A
Forum
We are not using dialer profiles since there is only one call destination.
We have CHAP configured on the physical BRI interface and I see no problems
with it. 'debug ppp neg' and 'debug ppp auth' report successful CHAP
authentication. Is it possible for initial negotiation to work but for
subs
> John Neiberger
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I'm stumped! (was EIGRP over ISDN) LONG
>
>
> I'm reposting this in the hopes that someone who didn't see it before
might
> have some ideas about this. H
age-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I'm stumped! (was EIGRP over ISDN) LONG
I'm reposting this in the hopes that someone who didn't see it before might
have some ideas about this. Hec
Is the spid number's configured right? and did you check to see if Demarc
is puch down right
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you tried downgrading IOS to a more experienced version, just to see if
your problem goes away?
>From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: I'm stumped! (was EIGRP over ISDN) LONG
&g
Yep, the line is configured correctly and functioning end-to-end with no
physical errors. We did initially have a problem with the spids and
switch-type because our wonderful provider Qwest has a sucky support
department that doesn't even know the difference between switch types. They
kept telli
John
> Have you tried downgrading IOS to a more experienced version, just to see
if
> your problem goes away?
>
>
> >From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subj
You really need to downgrade both routers to be sure.
>From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Frank Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: I'm stumped! (was EIGRP over ISDN) LONG
>Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:53:49 -0800 (PST)
>
>Yes,
Wells"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You really need to downgrade both routers to be sure.
>
>
> >From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Frank Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROT
]
Subject: I'm stumped! (was EIGRP over ISDN) LONG
I'm reposting this in the hopes that someone who didn't see it before might
have some ideas about this. Heck, SWAGs, educated guesstimates, or
telephone psychic impressions are also welcome. We are completely stumped
about how
> Kenny
>
> ""Frank Wells"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You really need to downgrade both routers to be sure.
> >
> >
> > >From: John Neiberger <[EMA
12 matches
Mail list logo
