IPv6 [7:31228]

2002-01-07 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Another question, When's IPv6 gonna hit the mainstream? Or the backbone? Of all the stuff I ever read on it, the main reason it came into play was because of the impending depletion of public addresses. Well with NAT, firewall and other proxy services handiling a lot of requests onto the publ

RE: IPv6 [7:31228]

2002-01-07 Thread Daniel Cotts
Security. BTW I had to look up RFC 1149. A classic! > -Original Message- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: IPv6 [7:31228] > > > Another question, > > When&#

Re: IPv6 [7:31228]

2002-01-08 Thread Geremy Meyers
had to look up RFC 1149. A classic! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:48 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: IPv6 [7:31228] > > > > > > Another question, >

Re: IPv6 [7:31228]

2002-01-08 Thread MADMAN
A peer of mine is doing some testing of IPv6, has a tunnel to the 6bone. There are a lot of organizations running some IPv6, more all the time. As for mainstream I would guess it's a good couple of years. It obviously cannot happen overnight but you will have the early adopters as as more peopl

Re: IPv6 [7:31228]

2002-01-08 Thread Brian Whalen
.bomb failures have lengthened the usefulness of v4 I am sure.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > Another question, > > When's IPv6 gonna hit the mainstream? Or the backbone? Of all the stuff I > ever read on it, the main