Anyone know of a way to route Vlans over a WAN other than using Cisco ISL?
I have customer with two sites, a 7204 on each site connected with a DS3 but
Cisco says that his VLAN info can only be passed over Ethernet interfaces.
He has a 6509 behind each router and the VLAN's are defined in those
Good God Man! Why are you routing VLAN's over a WAN. What is the problem you
are trying to solve???
Z
>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ISL & VLANS between routers
>D
ve???
>
>Z
>
>
>>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: ISL & VLANS between routers
>>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:29:05 -0800
>>
>>Anyone know of
e trying to solve???
>
>Z
>
>
>>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: ISL & VLANS between routers
>>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:29:05 -0800
>>
>>Anyone
gt;are trying to solve???
>
>Z
>
>
>>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: ISL & VLANS between routers
>>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:29:05 -0800
>>
>>A
issue, why even implement this?
It may be possible to do it, but why is it a good idea? I mean, I *can*
drink gasoline, but why should I?
Z
>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: IS
What the customer wants is to group users by the departments they work for
and use VLANs to control access to certain services on the remote site.
I would recommend ACL's but they are set on routing the VLAN info across the
2 sites.
I like the idea of setting up 2 vlans with identical policies on
#x27;t the issue, why even implement this?
>
> It may be possible to do it, but why is it a good
> idea? I mean, I *can*
> drink gasoline, but why should I?
>
> Z
>
> >From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
over a WAN. What is the problem
> you
> >are trying to solve???
> >
> >Z
> >
> >
> >>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: ISL
Juniper supports a feature called CCC (circuit cross connect) which essentially
enables layer two technologies to span across WAN backbones via MPLS. This works with
many layer two encapsulations including ppp, frame, ethernet/802.1q etc. This
technique can provide the type of functionality y
All,
>From the experience I have had in the campus networks,
I have done both ISL/802.1Q over single fiber between
buildings. I have always used a MLS with gigabit
technology for this design. The use of vlans, from my
understanding, is based on broadcast and the use of
being able to centralize man
Sorry, thats acct being located in 3 different
buildings not vlans. My point is the ability to do
configurations etc virtual and centrally versus
physically and distributed.
thanks
--- Peter Van Oene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juniper supports a feature called CCC (circuit cross
> connect) whi
Trunking requires at least 100mb speed.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
> All,
> From the experience I have had in the campus networ
Your point is valid, however the original posted indicated that they needed to extend
the broadcast domain over a wide area network and hoped to do it using 802.1q. Point
to Point fiber, even though it may be long in some cases, doesn't infer the same
characteristics as an IP WAN.
Pete
---
> From: Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
>
>
> > All,
> > From the experience I have had in the campus networks,
> > I have done both
Go take another look at your setup...
- Original Message -
From: Gareth Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
> You sure it can't be done
001 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
You sure it can't be done at 10Mb?
Pretty sure I've done it at 10Mb.
""Groupstudy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P
gt; wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Trunking requires at least 100mb speed.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
18 matches
Mail list logo
