i do agree with this . if you are lokking for more gig ports than , 6xxx
with MSFC is the one you should look at.
-NAD
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: L3 switch that support Gigabit
For 4000 series, if you buy the new integrated layer 3 services engine
(http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/switch/cat/c4000/prodlit/c4kl
3_ds.htm), it will support L3 switch.
Also, for the performance comparsion, it is not correct to just consider how
fast is the backplane speed. You
""BB"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8in01o$7p4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8in01o$7p4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyway, recommandation?
> Cisco 7500 router and Catalyst 5000/6000 series seems not suitable, as it
as
> very slow backplane
> and $$/gigabit channel are very expensive.
> i think it's
PROTECTED]
Subject: L3 switch that support Gigabit Ethernet
Anyway, recommandation?
Cisco 7500 router and Catalyst 5000/6000 series seems not suitable, as it as
very slow backplane
and $$/gigabit channel are very expensive.
i think it's because it is not designed for gigabit switiching
Anyway
--Original Message-
From: BB [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: L3 switch that support Gigabit Ethernet
Anyway, recommandation?
Cisco 7500 router and Catalyst 5000/6000 series
Anyway, recommandation?
Cisco 7500 router and Catalyst 5000/6000 series seems not suitable, as it as
very slow backplane
and $$/gigabit channel are very expensive.
i think it's because it is not designed for gigabit switiching
Anyway, I've checked Cat. 4000, it seems oko.
But, are there any other
6 matches
Mail list logo
