Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck, I am sorry to hear that someone as dedicated to having a thorough understanding of the technology and software necessary to become a CCIE has not made the mark this time - I'm sure that as many say the third time is a charm. However, as I mentioned in a previous post I have grave conce

RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-05 Thread Chuck Larrieu
: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142] Chuck, I can read the frustration in your post...I feel your pain. I have to say I am surprised to hear that your experience with the new lab was not a good one. If there is anybody I would say that about, it is you. I hope you are planning a vacation f

RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-05 Thread Rik Guyler
- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142] I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presen

RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-05 Thread Kane, Christopher A.
o be useful and applicable to real-world networking. Good luck on the next one sir. Chris -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142] I wish I could say it t

Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Tom Lisa
Chuck, I have no doubt you will succeed on your next attempt. I would venture a guess that if they hadn't switched to a one-day lab, you would have passed this time. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy Chuck Larrieu wrote: > I wish I c

Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Donny Mateo
Hi Chuck, sorry to hear that you didn't pass, but I do get the funny feeling that the next try is going bring good news to this list.. ;) Anyway, just wanted to say, your commment really makes the test sounds difficult if not impossible . Keep it on, and you'll be there in no time..;) Reg

RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Gregg Malcolm
Chuck, Thanks for the great feedback. Sounds like a killer. I'm taking the lab in a couple of months (failed my 1st attempt) and it was very helpful to hear your take. My question for you is, how much were you able to eat at lunch? Tests scores are directly proportional to the amount of food

RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
1 7:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142] I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case. For those ninnie

Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Paul Lalonde
Chuck, You didn't fail, buddy, you simply got one BIG step closer to achieving it. It's all about learning, right? I totally admire your approach, and I applaud your determination. The next one's got your name on it... count on it! Paul ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu
I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case. For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process, all I can say is WR