Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-13 Thread Mason
I do Telnet from a client on VLAN1 and I reach the server just fine. VLAN1 is where the server is also connected to. I do Telnet from any other VLAN: Telnet takes a long time, then it times out. That tells me it is something in the InterVLAN routing. What would be the next step to troubleshoot t

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-13 Thread Tauseef Nagi
Here are few things you could look into, 1) Is this a new config.? 2) Did it ever work before? if yes, what changed? 3) Assuming that routing is setup correctly on the Cat5K routing module (if this is being used), (a) do you have the right static routing setup on the server to respond to

RE: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-14 Thread Wright, Jeremy
]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] I do Telnet from a client on VLAN1 and I reach the server just fine. VLAN1 is where the server is also connected to. I do Telnet from any other VLAN: Telnet takes a long time

RE: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-14 Thread Ali, Abbas
: Tauseef Nagi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] Here are few things you could look into, 1) Is this a new config.? 2) Did it ever work before? if yes, what changed? 3) Assuming that

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-14 Thread Mason
Ok, so here is the status: Sniffer traces show that the latency occurs when I do telnet (regardless using IP or Netbios name) to three specific Unix servers. If I do telnet to another device on the same subnet, I have no problems. That eliminates any routing issues, correct ? But what the three se

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-15 Thread Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet
. "Mason" cc: Enviado por: Asunto: Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] nobody@groupstudy

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-15 Thread KM Reynolds
EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] >Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:36:01 -0500 > >Maybe the servers you are telnetting to, are trying to resolve the incoming >IP address to a name, and are waiting for the DNS to respond; try to verify >that

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-15 Thread Tauseef Nagi
In the Unix servers, please check for /etc/resolve.conf and see if name servers are configured correctly. If these Unix servers don't require name services, please add just their ip addresses to /etc/hosts file and then check for response time. This is "reverse nam lookup" issue. Thanks. Tauseef

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-15 Thread Brown, M
That was a reverse name lookup problem... fixed. Thanks... you guys are rocking ! ""Tauseef Nagi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In the Unix servers, please check for /etc/resolve.conf and see if name > servers are configured correctly. If these Unix servers don

Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187]

2002-03-17 Thread Mike Mandulak
It may seem obvious but double check the subnet masks on the servers. - Original Message - From: "Mason" To: Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:17 AM Subject: Re: Latency in Telnet, intervlan routing [7:38187] > Ok, so here is the status: > Sniffer traces show that th