Neil,
How did the canonical/MAC issue arise, and why is it so confusing?
I think it was a mistake. A mistake made because we are all guilty of using
terminology that means different things to different people. We often do
not bother to define something because it is so "natural" that "everyone
gth, Access Control, Routing
> Information... fields are added to the fram, and it is passed to the
Bridge
> module.
>
>
> Original Message Follows----
> From: "Neil Desai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Neil Desai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PRO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Layer 2 Addressing
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:00:56 -0400
I have asked this question once before and had little luck in finding the
answers. This time I have given a more explination and an example.
I have a problem in understanding the issues concer
I have asked this question once before and had little luck in finding the
answers. This time I have given a more explination and an example.
I have a problem in understanding the issues concerning canonical vs.
non-canonical addressing. I have read the archives of GroupStudy.com (both
CCIE and reg
4 matches
Mail list logo
