Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Nuurul Basar
I am planning to configured both my core and distributions as L3 device, and let the access switch to distribution using L2. I was advice that by doing this on my network two identical ip address on same subnet/vlan but in a different access switch can exist. And a packet that is attend to a host i

Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Robert Edmonds
I'm not sure I understand the question correctly, but I do know that it is never a good idea to duplicate IP addresses on your network. This can only lead to trouble. My advice would be, don't do it. ""Nuurul Basar"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am planning to configured both my

Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Peter van Oene
At 03:05 PM 5/27/2003 +, Nuurul Basar wrote: >I am planning to configured both my core and distributions as L3 device, and >let the access switch to distribution using L2. >I was advice that by doing this on my network two identical ip address on >same subnet/vlan but in a different access swit

RES: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Henrique Issamu Terada
terga-feira, 27 de maio de 2003 12:06 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Assunto: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576] > > I am planning to configured both my core and distributions as L3 device, > and > let the access switch to distribution using L2. > I was ad

RE: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Larry Letterman
That's incorrect and as others have said, it's a bad idea.. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nuurul Basar Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Layer 3 and 2 question

Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Peter van Oene
ferent customers? I am trying, but failing to understand what it is you are trying to do :-) Pete >- Original Message - >From: "Peter van Oene" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:51 AM >Subject: Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576] > > > >