RE: Linksys vs. Cisco [7:41829]

2002-04-18 Thread Kent Hundley
able for a corporate environment. Regards, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rico Ortiz Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Linksys vs. Cisco [7:41829] I always thought of Linksys as "Toy" Ho

Re: Linksys vs. Cisco [7:41829]

2002-04-18 Thread Magichut
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't the linksys a nat vpn router? Also if you do a search on google, you will find various postings of the linksys not "playing" well with other vpn's. If price is a concern, then remember these fine words: you get what you pay for. Go with Cisco, the name is not all

Re: OT: Linksys vs. Cisco [7:41829]

2002-04-18 Thread Craig Columbus
Having now played with the Linksys unit, I can only conclude that it's functionality is very limited and the unit will only work in the most basic of setups. For a site with 7-15 servers and 100 clients, I would NEVER consider the Linksys. If your sites are more than 5 users, the cost of the

OT: Linksys vs. Cisco [7:41829]

2002-04-18 Thread Rico Ortiz
I always thought of Linksys as "Toy" Home (SOHO) solutions. Lately I have been seeing post of people using Linksys' VPN solution. What is the different between Linksys VPN Solution (BEFVP41) and Cisco's 1751 VPN router. I am working on a project and if Cost is the only difference I will go with t