RE: Merging two companies

2001-02-06 Thread Rodney Jackson
, 2001 9:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Merging two companies I've never done this myself... But I do not see a reason why you cannot use NAT overloading to do the job 10.10.10.x---Real IP===Real IP -- 10.10.10.x Please correct me if I am wrong "&q

RE: Merging two companies

2001-02-06 Thread mjans001
Why don't you combine nat with 2 or 3 extra IP's in a dmz. The road from 1 to 2 would look like this. c1 NAT--FW-- vpn --FW--dmz- IP1 / ip2 / ip3 -dmz--- nat --- c2 10.x packet dest ip1/2/3 say 25.x 25.x server maps share/port/server to internal ip 10.x The dmz ip's can map

RE: Merging two companies

2001-02-06 Thread John Neiberger
locale. I don't see how NAT would help. -Original Message- From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Merging two companies I've never done this myself... But I do not see a reason why you

RE: Merging two companies

2001-02-06 Thread Tim Lovelace
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rodney Jackson Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 9:43 AM To: 'Santosh Koshy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Merging two companies Our routers can't determine if the traffic is local or remote. So traffic destine

RE: Merging two companies

2001-02-06 Thread John Dill
nvert them to be in a range we arent using. Hope that helps some Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rodney Jackson Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 9:43 AM To: 'Santosh Koshy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Merging two companies Our routers can't

RE: Merging two companies

2001-02-06 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
A variety of things need to happen to make this work, and address translation is just one of them. If both enterprises have used private address space, something that often simplifies the integration is to use what is called "double NAT": translate from Enterprise 1 space to a new private

Merging two companies

2001-02-05 Thread Rodney Jackson
Guys, We are merging with another company and plan to connect the two networks via DS3 but in the short term VPN. The problem is we both use the same private IP ranges. Is there anyone out there that has gone through this before and would you provide tips or information where I can get a white

Re: Merging two companies

2001-02-05 Thread Santosh Koshy
I've never done this myself... But I do not see a reason why you cannot use NAT overloading to do the job 10.10.10.x---Real IP===Real IP -- 10.10.10.x Please correct me if I am wrong ""Rodney Jackson"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 95nrbr$u2l$[EMAIL

Re: Merging two companies

2001-02-05 Thread Igor Glavanic
Right... Easiest is to use NAT. Check BCRAN book or Cisco website on more info on NAT. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Merging two companies

2001-02-05 Thread Groupstudy
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/3.html - Original Message - From: Rodney Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 6:35 PM Subject: Merging two companies Guys, We are merging with another company and plan