, 2001 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Merging two companies
I've never done this myself...
But I do not see a reason why you cannot use NAT overloading to do the
job
10.10.10.x---Real IP===Real IP -- 10.10.10.x
Please correct me if I am wrong
"&q
Why don't you combine nat with 2 or 3 extra IP's in a dmz.
The road from 1 to 2 would look like this.
c1 NAT--FW-- vpn --FW--dmz- IP1 / ip2 / ip3 -dmz--- nat --- c2
10.x packet dest ip1/2/3 say 25.x
25.x server maps share/port/server to internal ip 10.x
The dmz ip's can map
locale. I don't see how NAT would help.
-Original Message-
From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Merging two companies
I've never done this myself...
But I do not see a reason why you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rodney Jackson
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 9:43 AM
To: 'Santosh Koshy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Merging two companies
Our routers can't determine if the traffic is local or remote. So traffic
destine
nvert
them to be in a range we arent using.
Hope that helps some
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rodney Jackson
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 9:43 AM
To: 'Santosh Koshy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Merging two companies
Our routers can't
A variety of things need to happen to make this work, and address
translation is just one of them. If both enterprises have used
private address space, something that often simplifies the
integration is to use what is called "double NAT": translate from
Enterprise 1 space to a new private
Guys,
We are merging with another company and plan to connect the two networks via
DS3 but in the short term VPN. The problem is we both use the same private
IP ranges. Is there anyone out there that has gone through this before and
would you provide tips or information where I can get a white
I've never done this myself...
But I do not see a reason why you cannot use NAT overloading to do the
job
10.10.10.x---Real IP===Real IP -- 10.10.10.x
Please correct me if I am wrong
""Rodney Jackson"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
95nrbr$u2l$[EMAIL
Right...
Easiest is to use NAT.
Check BCRAN book or Cisco website on more info on NAT.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/3.html
- Original Message -
From: Rodney Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 6:35 PM
Subject: Merging two companies
Guys,
We are merging with another company and plan
10 matches
Mail list logo