I have 5 subnets:
172.29.10.x/24 in the U.S.
192.168.100.x/24 in the U.S.
I would like to eliminate the 192.x.x.x subnet as it is mostly redundant,
machines multihomed.
172.29.20.x/24 in Mexico
172.29.30.x/24 in Europe
172.29.40.x/24 in Mexico
Europe office has a 1720 router and E1 connection.
I've been trying to optimize communications between two distant routers. So
far I've managed to lock myself out of the far router three times, folks
over there are getting weary of my mistakes ;-)
I have a subnet of 172.29.30.0/24 and a subnet of 172.29.10.0/24, the latter
is physically the same
: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Messing up Access Lists [7:54268]
I've been trying to optimize communications between two distant routers.
So
far I've managed to lock myself out of the far router three times, folks
over there are getting weary of my mistakes
-Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Messing up Access Lists [7:54268]
I've been trying to optimize communications between two distant routers.
So
far I've managed to loc
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Messing up Access Lists [7:54268]
I've been trying to optimize communications between two
distant routers. So
far I've managed to lock myself out of the far router three
times, folks
over there are getting
a blocker is
in the way. Instead use a bounce pass.
-Original Message-
From: CTM CTM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Messing up Access Lists [7:54268]
I've been trying to optimize communications between
nce pass.
-Original Message-
From: CTM CTM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Messing up Access Lists [7:54268]
I've been trying to optimize communications between two
distant routers. So
7 matches
Mail list logo
