This can be done also. With PixOS version 6.0.x or higher this can be done
static (inside,outside) tcp 1.1.1.1 80 192.168.1.1 80 netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0
access-list 100 permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 80
access-group 100 permit in interface outside
Having said that, I prefer CheckPoint because
November 14, 2002 5:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]
>
>
> This is something that is easily done with most host based
> implementations of NAT. The objective is to use a single outside
> address. I want to NAT a network. However, the
;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]
This is something that is easily done with most host based
implementations of NAT. The objective is to use a single outside
address. I want to NAT a network. Howe
This is something that is easily done with most host based
implementations of NAT. The objective is to use a single outside
address. I want to NAT a network. However, there is a webserver on
the inside which people on the outside need to be able to reach. I
want to be able to redirect traffic s
4 matches
Mail list logo
