Re: No can do [7:34864]

2002-02-08 Thread Cisco Nuts
Can even do direct...just on the intf. itself but also can do on the subif as you mentioned :-) >From: "Curtis Phillips" >Reply-To: "Curtis Phillips" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: No can do [7:34864] >Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:18:03 -0500 >

Re: No can do [7:34864]

2002-02-08 Thread Jonathan Mian
Oh yes you can...read this:http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/frbacktoback.html Extract from the link: Introduction This document is a sample configuration for setting up two Cisco routers back-to-back using Frame Relay (FR) encapsulation. The routers are connected using data communications eq

Re: No can do [7:34864]

2002-02-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Your answer is logical, but not true for Cisco. Cisco lets you do back-to-back Frame Relay. I think they added it mostly to allows training classes to save on equipment costs! If a person can afford to use a router in the middle as a switch, it really enables a better understanding of Frame Re

Re: No can do [7:34864]

2002-02-08 Thread Curtis Phillips
You can connect two routers back-back using frame relay encaps. It must be done on subinterfaces.. - Original Message - From: "Chris Charlebois" To: Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: No can do [7:34864] > You cannot simulate frame-relay with 2 routers.

No can do [7:34864]

2002-02-08 Thread Chris Charlebois
You cannot simulate frame-relay with 2 routers. A minimuim of three are required. One router must serve as the frame-relay switch. This router needs to be connected to both other routers via back-to-back serial connections. In many ways, frame-relay is analogous to IP. It's just one more set