One of the cisco press books indicates one should use
type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by
1 ASBR and type 2 externals when there's a single
ASBR.
Are there any issues if one uses type 1 external even
when the route is being advertised by a single ASBR? It
would seem useful,
At 5:00 PM + 12/3/02, p b wrote:
One of the cisco press books indicates one should use
type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by
1 ASBR and type 2 externals when there's a single
ASBR.
This is just plain wrong. The reason you have E1 and E2 is to have
different routing policies.
Comments inline:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 5:00 PM + 12/3/02, p b wrote:
One of the cisco press books indicates one should use
type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by
1 ASBR and type 2 externals when there's a single
ASBR.
This is just plain wrong. The reason you
Some thoughts below
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 13:26, p b wrote:
Comments inline:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 5:00 PM + 12/3/02, p b wrote:
One of the cisco press books indicates one should use
type 1 externals when the route is being advertised by
1 ASBR and type 2 externals when
Sorry. Wasn't trying to suggest Howard was wrong, just providing
the source of where I read the information.
Everything Howard mentions makes sense.
But when there's a single ASBR, it seems that there's no
difference in E1 or E2 other than E1 give ya the cost to the
external for free. I'm
5 matches
Mail list logo