At 12:01 AM 3/5/02, Hunt Lee wrote:
>TCP / IP Vol1 by Jeff Doyle says if a subnet is summarized by a summary
>address, the subnet's instability will no longer be advertised. But if this
>is the case, then what happens if:-
>
>e.g. Router A advertised a summary route (advertising subnet 172.20.10
Comments below
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Hunt Lee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I believe someone might have mentioned this already but since
I'm
> studying
> it right now I thought I'd ask again... It would be greatly
appreciated
> if
> someone can shed some light on this.
>
> For OSPF,
unless you are advertising a host route, I don't think there would be any
effect here. and to be truthful, I'm not sure that the routing process cares
one way or another so long as the particular router's LAN port is
functional.
the routing table would show that host route 172.20.10.1 is reachabl
I believe someone might have mentioned this already but since I'm studying
it right now I thought I'd ask again... It would be greatly appreciated if
someone can shed some light on this.
For OSPF, I understand that a "flapping" subnet will cause LSAs to be
flooded throughout the internetwork at
4 matches
Mail list logo
