Router ospf 100
network 20.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 5
network 20.1.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 5
network 20.1.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 5
network 212.1.22.64 0.0.0.31 area 0
area 5 range 20.1.0.0 255.255.252.0
Is the above summarization valid for the above networks?
Thanks,
Evan
Does anyone know of a way to summarize an OSPF address (such as a / 27 bit
subnet mask) to a classful boundary for redistribution into a classful IGP
such as RIP v1 or IGRP?
Any suggestions would be appreciated!!!
Thanks!!!
LAB
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscrip
Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having
trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be
embarrassed. :-) While working on one of the Fatkid's labs I see the
following in the Hints sections:
3. There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OS
Here's my guess. I've included the first two for clarity.
1. Inter-area route summarization with commands of the form
"area 1 range 10.1.2.0 255.255.224.0"
2. External route summarization with commands of the form
"summary-address 10.1.2.0 225.255.224.0"
3. Static route of the form
"i
I thought of that solution (#3) but I wasn't sure if that was what he
was referring to. Usually, in the context of CCIE lab studies, the labs
state that you can't use static routes. However, this wasn't part of
the lab, it was just in the Hints section of a lab so that restriction
might not have
, 2001 09:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]
Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having
trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be
embarrassed. :-) While working on one of the Fa
ssage-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]
Yep, distribute-lists could work in conjuction with Jonathan's
suggestion of redistributing a static route. I
king about OSPF then ask if there were
other
ways
to accomplish the same goal by using a non-protocol dependent,
non-router
platform
dependent method?
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
8 matches
Mail list logo