OSPF Route Summarization

Router ospf 100 network 20.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 5 network 20.1.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 5 network 20.1.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 5 network 212.1.22.64 0.0.0.31 area 0 area 5 range 20.1.0.0 255.255.252.0 Is the above summarization valid for the above networks? Thanks, Evan

OSPF route summarization - to FLSM routing protocol

Does anyone know of a way to summarize an OSPF address (such as a / 27 bit subnet mask) to a classful boundary for redistribution into a classful IGP such as RIP v1 or IGRP? Any suggestions would be appreciated!!! Thanks!!! LAB _ FAQ, list archives, and subscrip

OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]

Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be embarrassed. :-) While working on one of the Fatkid's labs I see the following in the Hints sections: 3. There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OS

Re: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]

Here's my guess. I've included the first two for clarity. 1. Inter-area route summarization with commands of the form "area 1 range 10.1.2.0 255.255.224.0" 2. External route summarization with commands of the form "summary-address 10.1.2.0 225.255.224.0" 3. Static route of the form "i

Re: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]

I thought of that solution (#3) but I wasn't sure if that was what he was referring to. Usually, in the context of CCIE lab studies, the labs state that you can't use static routes. However, this wasn't part of the lab, it was just in the Hints section of a lab so that restriction might not have

RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]

, 2001 09:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771] Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be embarrassed. :-) While working on one of the Fa

RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]

ssage- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771] Yep, distribute-lists could work in conjuction with Jonathan's suggestion of redistributing a static route. I

RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]

king about OSPF then ask if there were other ways to accomplish the same goal by using a non-protocol dependent, non-router platform dependent method? -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: R