EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 09:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]
Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having
trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be
em
ssage-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]
Yep, distribute-lists could work in conjuction with Jonathan's
suggestion of redistributing a static route. I
, 2001 09:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]
Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having
trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be
embarrassed. :-) While working on one of the Fa
I thought of that solution (#3) but I wasn't sure if that was what he
was referring to. Usually, in the context of CCIE lab studies, the labs
state that you can't use static routes. However, this wasn't part of
the lab, it was just in the Hints section of a lab so that restriction
might not have
Here's my guess. I've included the first two for clarity.
1. Inter-area route summarization with commands of the form
"area 1 range 10.1.2.0 255.255.224.0"
2. External route summarization with commands of the form
"summary-address 10.1.2.0 225.255.224.0"
3. Static route of the form
"i
Okay, this doesn't quite qualify as a trick question but I'm having
trouble finding the answer. I hope it's not too obvious or I'll be
embarrassed. :-) While working on one of the Fatkid's labs I see the
following in the Hints sections:
3. There are two built in OSPF methods to summarize OS
6 matches
Mail list logo
