then there is no
reason to fix it, unless you are a consultant and the customer is willing to
pay for it.
Ejay Hire
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]
Hi;
Thank you.
Vincent Chong
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3173&t=3154
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosur
ort,
Authentication stops someone from plugging in a router within your
Authenticated Area & picking up LSA info.
All the best !!!
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Chong
To:
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 3:53 AM
Subject: OSPF virtual link Question [7:3154]
> Hi;
>
&g
I don't know what you mean by OSPF area rule, nor by the virtual link rule,
but:
In order to route from one of "not-backbone OSPF area" to another
"not-backbone OSPF area", you need to cross the backbone area (area 0). For
this reason, if one has two chained areas that do not "share" the backbone
Hi;
Due to the mail system incompatiable, the message was truncated,
I will provide more information to let you guys have more information.
Area 0 is formed by Router A and Router B
Area 1 is formed by Router B and Router C
Area 4 is formed by Router C only.
Router C set up a virtual link wi
Configuration topology is okay. In this case you have area 1 as a transit
area.
It should work fine without any authentication.
The thing to know, however, is that the configuration command is a bit
misleading:
(config-router)#area n virtual-link partner-router-id
Where n is, in this case 1.
The r
Hi;
The following scenario
[RouteA area0][area0 RouterB area1]<--[area1
RouterC area4]
|
|
|
|
|__Virtual link___|
Does this topology is valid in OSPF?
I belive that the configuration has topo
WHERE IS THE DIAGRAM
-Original Message-
From: Manish Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF virtual link question
Consider the above OSPF network. You have configured
D]
Subject: OSPF virtual link question
Consider the above OSPF network. You have configured a virtual path to
connect Area 3 with Area 0. What is your assessment of this network?
1. The network will work. However, you must configure a second
virtual link through router B to ensure th
ummm i think something is missing ? Which above OSP network ?
-Original Message-
From: Manish Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF virtual link question
Consider the above OSPF network
SPF virtual link question
Consider the above OSPF network. You have configured a virtual path to
connect Area 3 with Area 0. What is your assessment of this network?
1. The network will work. However, you must configure a second
virtual link through router B to ensure there are no rout
Ditto. No piccy.
""Manish Patel"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
>
> Consider the above OSPF network. You have configured a virtual path to
> connect Area 3 with Area 0. What is your assessment of this network?
>
> 1. The network will
Consider the above OSPF network. You have configured a virtual path to
connect Area 3 with Area 0. What is your assessment of this network?
1. The network will work. However, you must configure a second
virtual link through router B to ensure there are no routing loops.
2. The
13 matches
Mail list logo
