Hi all,
Here is a quick post from Dave Katz on ISIS vs OSPF in large networks
dealing with the issue of which protocol inherently scales better. This is
from a thread in the IETF OSPF WG mailing list for those looking for the
full thread. Dave has participated significantly in the
At 10:09 AM -0500 3/11/03, Peter van Oene wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a quick post from Dave Katz on ISIS vs OSPF in large
networks dealing with the issue of which protocol inherently scales
better. This is from a thread in the IETF OSPF WG mailing list for
those looking for the full thread. Dave
company networks. rarely
will you see IS IS networks, and it is a shame,
since i like it personaly.
Morgan
-Message d'origine-
De: Kent [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: mardi 6 juin 2000 22:59
À: Andy Harding; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Re: Fw: OSPF vs ISIS
Well
It looks to me that everybody prefers OSPF in our
company, just wondering any reasons that we do not
want to use ISIS?
Thanks
Kent
For enterprise networks, there is no particular benefit to using
ISIS. Many of the large ISPs do use it, in many cases for historical
reasons. There are some
try hiring staff with IS-IS experience...;-)
- Original Message -
From: Kent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 6:08 PM
Subject: OSPF vs ISIS
It looks to me that everybody prefers OSPF in our
company, just wondering any reasons that we do
5 matches
Mail list logo