Hello,
I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html but
I don't understand why they use 192.168.1.0.
Here is my topology:
172.16.1.0/24(outside)---PIX---(inside)172.16.2.0/24
I create a pool 172.
If you're setting up w/o nat why the pool? Also, you need 'NAT 0' to keep
the in/out from getting a translation.
At 07:00 PM 10/28/00 -0700, Jim Bond wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
>success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/pub
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jim Bond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
> success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html but
> I don't understand why they use 192.168.1.0.
>
> Here is my topology:
> 172.16.1.0/24(out
At 09:33 PM 10/29/00 -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jim Bond wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
> > success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html but
> > I don't understand why they u
You do not need a static statement. Are you using mppe for your pptp ?
Is this PPTP on win 98 or win 2k ? Send me the config file ... oh and
one more thing do not go by the docs on Cisco's web site they are
wrong and TAC with all it's CCIEs is useless. Email me your config and
I beleive I can hel
A PIX -is- a router (firewall router.) Hence, ip route statements and the
ability to run RIP. It's a box with two (or more) interfaces that connects
networks. Granted, it's not a box you would use for 'normal' routing
functions but to say the PIX is not a router is just wrong.
Little off th
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Andrew wrote:
> >According to this, it looks like you should have NAT. You have a different
> >network outside than inside.
>
> Don't all routers that are routing between networks? ;) The PIX is not
> necessarily a NAT box. It performs statefull security for established
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andrew wrote:
> A PIX -is- a router (firewall router.) Hence, ip route statements and the
> ability to run RIP. It's a box with two (or more) interfaces that connects
> networks. Granted, it's not a box you would use for 'normal' routing
> functions but to say the PIX i
The PIX absolutely has default route statements. 'ip route outside|inside'
At 07:58 AM 10/30/00 -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andrew wrote:
>
> > A PIX -is- a router (firewall router.) Hence, ip route statements and the
> > ability to run RIP. It's a box with two (or more) i
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andrew wrote:
> The PIX absolutely has default route statements. 'ip route outside|inside'
True. My APC power strip has a default route statement, does that make
it a router?
If you try not to think of a PIX as a router, it will be a lot easier to
understand. Yes, it m
If your APC power strip had more than one interface and could route packets
between the interfaces then 'yes.'
At 09:44 AM 10/30/00 -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andrew wrote:
>
> > The PIX absolutely has default route statements. 'ip route outside|inside'
>
>True. My APC po
Looks like we have conflct of definations here. Whatever everybody thinks
about the device is not that important. The guy who posted message might be
looking for an answer to his problem rather than learning defination of
router. Rather than fighting over defination let's help him.
Sam
> If you
I don't think this is just splitting hairs, I think the question (what was
it again??) is being answered. I think Jay's explanations have been right
on target and are an aid in gaining an understanding of how the PIX works.
I'm surprised it isn't on the lab exam yet.
George
At 12:19 PM 10/30/00
AIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: PIX PPTP, no NAT
> I don't think this is just splitting hairs, I think the question (what was
> it again??) is being answered. I think Jay's explanations have been right
> on targ
I'll agree that the PIX is a partial router, but just barely...
It will not route to another router within your protected area...
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
the mere existence of a CCIE Security beta exam tells me that there will
soon be a CCIE / Security track, in addition to the R&S, ISP, and WAN ( with
the Design due Real Soon Now? )
No doubt PIX will figure heavly in this one. :->
Chuck
George Spahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL
16 matches
Mail list logo
