Jennifer Joy sent me a suggestion that I include the "Precedence: bulk"
header in the e-mail messages that go out from this list. Apparently the
vacation program uses the Precedence to determine if it should send an
auto-reply back. So maybe this will cut down on the amount of "Out of
Office" me
Title: RE: Precedence: Bulk and a fix for vactions autoresponders
That would be *awesome*! My Out of Office rule in Outlook is beginning to look pretty crowded since different e-mail programs have different ways of saying "I'm not here."
-Original Message-
From: Paul B
Title: RE: Precedence: Bulk and a fix for vactions autoresponders
In
exchange server using the precedence: bulk setting tells the server not to send
a nondelivery message back to the sender if the recipient is not valid. If
you do any automated updating like dropping email addresses from
On 26 Sep 2000 17:24:41 -0400, Paul Borghese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Jennifer Joy sent me a suggestion that I include the "Precedence: bulk"
:header in the e-mail messages that go out from this list. Apparently the
:vacation program uses the Precedence to determine if it should send an
:auto
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: Precedence: Bulk and a fix for vactions autoresponders
> On 26 Sep 2000 17:24:41 -0400, Paul
5 matches
Mail list logo
