Re: (no subject) [7:70561]

2003-06-12 Thread chengpeng
there are three kind of administrative distance for BGP: 1. external-distance: 20 2. internal-distance: 200 3. local-distance: 200 you can change that through the "distance bgp external-distance internal-distance local-distance" command For BGP the network used by the network x.x.x.x backdoor co

Re: (no subject) [7:70562]

2003-06-12 Thread ramesh_cisco
It certainly prefers IGP to EBGP ,but not sure about changing metric ...any one has any idea??? ramesh ,ccnp "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: Does the BGP backdoor command change the administrative distance of EBGP from 20 to 200 ? Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.ind

Re: RE: (no subject) [7:70562]

2003-06-12 Thread ramesh_cisco
bgp backdoor has got a specific use ..suppose you have a network that you have learnt both from igp(ospf) & egp(ebgp), then your router prepers egbp route as it is having less metric .If you want to force your router to prefer igp router,you need to add router backdoor entry in bgp config of your

RE: (no subject) [7:70562]

2003-06-11 Thread grant grant123nj
Hi, Srivathsan As I know, Cisco network backdoor command in BGP is to generate a local BGP route, of which administrative distance is 200. The only difference between the network and the network backdoor command is that the later route is not advertised to EBGP peer. Regards, Grant Message Post

RE: (no subject) [7:3989]

2001-05-10 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Check out CCO, under certifications. There is a voice over ip faq there. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian M. Green Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 5:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:(no subject) [7:3989] I am

Re: (no subject)

2001-04-03 Thread Mark Mahoney
Isn't semantic that virus company? Norton semantic is his name. The owner, I mean... I was blinded by swamp gas...Yeh...Thats it! ;~) MM "Douglas F. Elznic" wrote: > > On 03 Apr 2001 10:16:20 -0500, Mark Mahoney wrote: > > Check out this link before it disappears. It seems that someone has

Re: (no subject)

2001-04-03 Thread Mark Mahoney
Greetings Earthlings! To all those who mailed, and all those who did not, I plead caffeine deficiency, which affected my ability to process what I was looking at. In fact, as some may note, the 'to:' field in my post contains mail addresses. Folks who are not on the list! I was so daft as to no

RE: (no subject)

2001-04-03 Thread Buri, Heather H
, TX 77056 -Original Message- From: Douglas "F." Elznic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 5:57 AM To: Mark Mahoney Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (no subject) On 03 Apr 2001 10:16:20 -0500, Mark Mahoney wrote: > Check out this link before it disappe

Re: (no subject)

2001-04-03 Thread F.
On 03 Apr 2001 10:16:20 -0500, Mark Mahoney wrote: > Check out this link before it disappears. It seems that someone has > hacked into the M$ kb and placed a funny TID in there. > > Mark > > > http://www.microsoft.com&[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Q209355.asp > > > No one hacked microsoft for this. Th

Re: (no subject)

2001-01-21 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, Try tracing back to your authenticatioon server once you are into the remote router. If the access is ok then make sure the remote router knows where the authentication server is. eg. tacacs-server host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx It would seem you are getting the last choice to log in. Just a thou

Re: (no subject)

2000-10-27 Thread Mike
http://www.boson.com/promo/utilities/getpass/getpass_utility.htm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is there a website that decrypts Cisco password. I was told there is one. > Any directions, will like to try it out on my box. > >

RE: (no subject)

2000-10-27 Thread Shaun Wakelen
On www.boson.com there is a free utilities download, which includes a level 7 password decryption utility. Very useful! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 October 2000 15:32 To: [EMAI

Re: (no subject)

2000-09-26 Thread Csweeting
Has anyone tried password recovery using the new Cosmo IOS, Using the information from this web site http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_6000MSFC.html I cant get the config-registry to change from 2x2102 any suggestion. Please write me back at this address **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List h

Re: (no subject, your questions...)

2000-09-25 Thread Dale Holmes
1. No. Get the fixed Hyperterminal from www.hilgraeve.com or use something else, like TeraTerm. 2. www.cisco.com, documentation section... >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: (no subject) >Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:05:15 EDT > >I have two qu

Re: (no subject)

2000-09-01 Thread Kenny Sallee
Do you understand routing on a stick? Just imagine the MSFC as an external router with a trunk connection to the switch and sub-interfaces ( VLAN interfaces ) create for each VLAN. Actually if you do a "sh trunk" on a cat6k with an MSFC you'll see an ISL trunk to the MSFC. Kenny - Orig

Re: (no subject)

2000-09-01 Thread Flem
Why do you think that using layer3 switching makes a difference for your end systems ? flem --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey Guy how are you doing I have a question for you? > I hope you can help > My question to you is Layer 3 vlan. I fully > understand setting up networks using subnets and

RE: (no subject)

2000-09-01 Thread Smith, Warren
Or you using DHCP or static IP's? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) Hey Guy how are you doing I have a question for you? I hope you can help My question to you is La

Re: [No Subject]

2000-08-06 Thread Kenneth
it's 822; I just took the exam yesterday... "Jorge Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 380063521.965534071260.JavaMail.root@web193-iw">news:380063521.965534071260.JavaMail.root@web193-iw... > I believe it is 750. > > --Original Message-- > From: "Nischal Chandra" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [No Subject]

2000-08-05 Thread Jorge Rodriguez
I believe it is 750. --Original Message-- From: "Nischal Chandra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 6, 2000 2:20:35 AM GMT Subject: [No Subject] What is the minimum required for pass in the New CCNA 2.0 Thanks Nischal Jorge Rodriguez /CCNA Network Analyst R&S Net

Re: (no subject)

2000-08-02 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr
yeah - Original Message - From: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: James Dezern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 9:54 AM Subject: RE: (no subject) > I'd have no problem providing info IF

Re: (no subject)

2000-08-02 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr
ok - Original Message - From: James Dezern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 9:44 AM Subject: Re: (no subject) > Why don't you stop wasting bandwidth o

RE: (no subject)

2000-08-02 Thread Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor
rom: James Dezern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 9:44 AM To: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor; Cisco Subject: Re: (no subject) Why don't you stop wasting bandwidth on answers like you've been providing. If your going to reply to it at least add some informat

Re: (no subject)

2000-08-02 Thread James Dezern
. If your going to contribute then at least make it meaningful. Thanks in advance... - Original Message - From: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 10:12 AM Subject: RE: (no subject) &

RE: (no subject)

2000-08-02 Thread Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor
yes -Original Message- From: MANOJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 4:28 AM To: Cisco Subject: (no subject) Hi everybody, Can anyone recomend some good books to prepare for BCSN, BCMSN, BCRAN and Support 2.0. Thanks in advance. Manoj. __

RE: (no subject)

2000-07-10 Thread Charls CTT
If you took the CCNA 1.0 before July 31st you will be CCNA any way. There are no problem, you keep your certification as CCNA, any way, the CCNA 2.0 is easy, it just ask a little more about concepts and study cases. Carlos Grisales CCSI - CCNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ashley Padua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> es