RE: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
rtain applications, and it's not surprising that the details of its reliable multicast are the "family jewels" of EIGRP and have not been made public. > >-Original Message- >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 1:49 PM &

RE: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Kane, Christopher A.
syn, syn-ack and ack anytime i see tcp i think of a one-to-one communication that must adhere to the 3-way handshake. -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: About ip helper-address

Re: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Erica L Johansson
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 01:04:52PM -0400 or thereabouts, Sean Wu wrote: > Actually, that was my questions too. I am not sure if all broadcast are > based on udp instead of TCP, like all multicast are based on udp to avoice > unnecessary retransmission. Maybe broadcast is the same case. Is my > und

RE: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>i'll take a stab at howard's question: > >because of the reliability requirements placed by tcp ? You're on the right track. What relationships and topologies do these requirements suggest between sender and receiver? > >-Original Message- >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Kane, Christopher A.
i'll take a stab at howard's question: because of the reliability requirements placed by tcp ? -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: About ip helper-address >I kno

Re: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Atif Awan
t: Re: About ip helper-address >Actually, that was my questions too. I am not sure if all broadcast are >based on udp instead of TCP, like all multicast are based on udp to avoice >unnecessary retransmission. Maybe broadcast is the same case. Is my >understanding correct? > >Ci

Re: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Sean Wu
Actually, that was my questions too. I am not sure if all broadcast are based on udp instead of TCP, like all multicast are based on udp to avoice unnecessary retransmission. Maybe broadcast is the same case. Is my understanding correct? Cisco has a "ip forward-protocol dns", is it true that it i

Re: About ip helper-address

2000-08-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>I know this is for udp broadcast forward, but is there anyway to forward tcp >broadcast? If there is, what scenarios should we use tcp/udp broadcast >forward? >Thanks > > What have you seen that produces TCP broadcasts? As a study question, why would it be unlikely to have a broadcast mechanism