RE: Access-list Assistance Needed [7:42351]

2002-04-23 Thread Chris Charlebois
First of all, this won't work, unless you have the 198.x.x.x subnet setup as a secondary address on the serial interface of the 1720. The global address have to be available to the outside interface of the NAT router. If you have those addresses available, then, yes, it is possible. I will work

RE: Access-list Assistance Needed [7:42351]

2002-04-23 Thread Chris Charlebois
OK, if we assume that the ISP has also assigned 198.x.x.4/30 to this client and has the apropriate routing in place... ip nat inside source list 1 interface serial 0 overload ip nat inside source static 192.168.10.5 198.0.0.5 interface e0 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside int

RE: Access-list Assistance Needed [7:42351]

2002-04-23 Thread JunoGuy
I appreciate your assistance. Assuming that this the secondary interface is required. Can the same be achieved by overloading to a POOL instead? I dont understand why you need to have a secondary IP address when the ISP is already routing traffic to the 198 subnet. Also, say that traffic reac

RE: Access-list Assistance Needed [7:42351]

2002-04-23 Thread Chris Charlebois
First off, you caught a typo. That should have been 198.x.x.5, not 192.x.x.5. Secondly, going back to your first reposte... from your original post, it was not clear that the 198.x.x.x was being routed to you from the ISP. Ideally, you would have a /248 address space from the ISP, so you can as