CCNA CNA A+
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 6:10 PM
To: 'Daniel Boutet'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
No problem Daniel, and thanks to you and the others who rep
en'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:33:06 -0400
To add a little twist to that scenario.
If for instance in your server block, you place 2 NICs on ea
/ccnp
-Original Message-
From: Ejay Hire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
You are correct. It is POSSIBLE to do it this way as long as the two
separate VL
You are correct. It is POSSIBLE to do it this way as long as the two
separate VLAN's share NOTHING. (No servers, No internet connections,
Nothing.)
However, This is typically known as "Bad design" and "administrative
nightmare"
Good Luck.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message Follows
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Boutet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
I noticed after I sent. Sorry Ole
"Ole Drews Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Boutet1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:22 AM
> To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
>
>
> I have one problem with thi
/ccnp
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Boutet1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:22 AM
To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets
I have one problem with this scenario:
Why did you put VLAN under la
To add a little twist to that scenario.
If for instance in your server block, you place 2 NICs on each machine
address them to the different subnets. Plug each NIC onto a port on the
switch/switches, and assign those ports to the appropriate VLAN.
Theoretically would this allow each of the VL
I have one problem with this scenario:
Why did you put VLAN under layer 3 info?
As far as I know they are strictly L2
My two cents:
Assuming that they have their own servers, and that you are not routing
between them
then they can have any address that you wish (private). It is like ha
Looks good to me, however if you are planning to use inter-VLan routing you
might want to make sure that the protocol you select can handle VLSM.
David Ng
Senior Systems Engineer
Integration Technologies Inc.
1201 Dove Street Suite 200
Newport Beach CA 92660
Microsoft MCSE, Cisco CCNA/CCDA,
10 matches
Mail list logo
