have bigger problems to worry about
than a loss of a peer session.
(Fried NPMs w/ barbecue sauce anyone?)
my .01 (I'm a cheapo)
Wayne
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP A
You're absolutely correct! :-) I did not RTFM, and I soon discovered
that I should have. But, I just removed that statement since it really
wasn't necessary. I was just playing around and got burned.As
you can tell, I still have not RTFM about that particular command since
I did not know t
maybe you forgot to RTFM and missed that
"warning-only" part. Check it again ;>
Of course, it may have been a good thing
if you were to get the entirety of the IPv4
prefixes as /32's from your peer. I bet
you wouldn't like that. I think I'd rather
have the session go down.
-dre
""John Neiber
When I tried this method, there was a time when our provider
accidentally sent too many prefixes and it hit the maximum limit which
shutdown the session. I had to manually restart the session, and I
wouldn't consider that to be a good thing.
My $.02
John
>>> "dre" 8/7/01 1:37:17 PM >>>
neighbo
outes 100 to 500 ONLY coming from EBGP
peer
> router?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> dre
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: BGP Alarms?
Hi,
How about if you want range of routes 100 to 500 ONLY coming from EBGP peer
router?
Thanks in advance!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
dre
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP Alarms? [7
neighbor maximum-prefix
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r
/iprprt2/1rdbgp.htm#xtocid142343
-dre
""Chris"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was told that there is a criteria to set BGP alarms so that when the
> routing t
7 matches
Mail list logo
