Fair? Why would you think it is not "fair?
Consider that the command you give is straightforward and will indeed enable
IPX routing. Now then, do you know what happens as a result of that command?
Have you thought of this in terms of how an IPX network is numbered, and
what an important and signi
Another thing to think about:
What IPX issues might arise if the router only has serial interfaces?
At 12:30 PM -0400 5/27/02, Chuck wrote:
>Fair? Why would you think it is not "fair?
>
>Consider that the command you give is straightforward and will indeed enable
>IPX routing. Now then, do
In my opinion that question is fair game. the optional MAC address that can
be specified is used for interface that have no bia, such as serial and
loopback interfaces. By default they "borrow" the MAC from a LAN interface,
but you may want to specify your own in order to keep documentation and
tr
So far I'm running about 3 to 1 in favor of the question as it is. Both
sides have made interesting arguments in their favor. But I'm a bit biased :)
Logan, I had not thought of the IPX pinging, good call on that.
MikeS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45248&t=
At 09:39 AM 5/27/02, Mike Sweeney wrote:
>I have a IPX question in my CCNA practice test beta and I've had some mixed
>feedback on it. The questions asks what is the command to enable IPX routing
>on a router and gives a MAC address as part of the question. The question is
>a *fill in the blank* t
y 28, 2002 11:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CCNA level IPX question, proper phrasing [7:45138]
>
>
> So far I'm running about 3 to 1 in favor of the question as
> it is. Both
> sides have made interesting arguments in their favor. But I'm
> a bit
It win2K friendly.. in fact it's being developed on a Win2K box :) I will
check the current package since I reloaded it late yesterday with some edits.
MikeS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45279&t=45138
--
FAQ,
7 matches
Mail list logo
