At 07:11 AM 7/18/00, Glenn Flood wrote:
>All,
>
>I am taking CIT next week and need some advice from people that have taken
>this exam recently. Are there any fill-in-the-blanks like on ACRC? I am
>having a lot of trouble the Boson "packet trace" questions. Are the many
>of these type on the te
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CIT next week
I just finished it yesterday. Out of all the tests I think CLSC was the
most poorly written, but CIT comes in a close second.
The questions are very vague, and you
I just finished it yesterday. Out of all the tests I think CLSC was the
most poorly written, but CIT comes in a close second.
The questions are very vague, and you often have to guess what they are
looking for. They aren't extremely hard though, and if you are familiar
with the topics you sh
Realy, passed bot CIT 4.0 & Support 2.0-
I can tell you'd know well packet traces, IPX and AT
(both regarding traces (802.3raw, SNAP etc) and in general.
You have to know possible sources of TR soft&hard errors also.
As I remember- no cli to enter-
but prepair to feel free with all subjects I ment
4 matches
Mail list logo
