RE: Correction - about multicast address! [7:29057]

2001-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On May 6, 8:25am, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: } } It does help to have the option of copy and pasting from one's current } work! ;-) } } A few people have asked, and I responded a couple times, but I think they } all got filtered (hmm what does that mean?), but I am working on a new book }

RE: Correction - about multicast address! [7:29057]

2001-12-14 Thread Elmer Deloso
- about multicast address! [7:29057] And you probably also meant to say that the MAC header only has room for one data-link-layer address also. So the IP multicast address is converted to a single MAC multicast address. Applications on end systems register with the NIC to receive packets addressed

RE: Correction - about multicast address! [7:29057]

2001-12-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
of post is a preview of the sequel to Top Down Network Design, right? Elmer -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Correction - about multicast address! [7:29057] And you probably

RE: Correction - about multicast address! [7:29057]

2001-12-13 Thread Karen E Young
Reding this over I realize that I should have explained a little better... What I should have said is An IP header only has room for one destination address, therefore a MAC must be manufactured for the group rather than a specific device so that the layer-2 protocol (ethernet, token-ring, etc.)

RE: Correction - about multicast address! [7:29057]

2001-12-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
And you probably also meant to say that the MAC header only has room for one data-link-layer address also. So the IP multicast address is converted to a single MAC multicast address. Applications on end systems register with the NIC to receive packets addressed to particular multicast