RE: Design Help [7:15907]

2001-08-13 Thread Bill Carter
The first question is how many locations are we talking about. I would prefer the 1720 routers. These have the same processor as the 2600's. Don't worry about the VPN features, just don't configure them and it's not an issue. These are marketed as VPN routers because of the processing power.

RE: Design Help [7:15907]

2001-08-13 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:10 PM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Design Help [7:15907] Hey Ole, we use all 1720s at the lower end clients. The VPN features are only there if the right IOS is there. The 2600 should be fine. Look

RE: Design Help [7:15907]

2001-08-13 Thread Steve Smith
Hey Ole, we use all 1720s at the lower end clients. The VPN features are only there if the right IOS is there. The 2600 should be fine. Look at your routing protocol, if you are using OSPF or something like that, you may want and probably will have to bump up the ram DRAM in the 1720 to handle it

Re: Design Help [7:15907]

2001-08-13 Thread nahc
Depending on how many nodes, manageability wise, pick one router, this maybe overkill for some sites, but in the long run having one model makes life easier. my 2 cent At 02:42 PM 8/13/01 -0400, Ole Drews Jensen wrote: I would appreciate some good advice on this from some of you design boys

RE: Design Help [7:15907]

2001-08-13 Thread Symon Thurlow
). Symon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 August 2001 20:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Design Help [7:15907] The first question is how many locations are we talking about. I would prefer the 1720 routers. These have the same processor