I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old. She's
5 ft tall and about 100 pounds. She'll eat any cat. Dogs are superior. :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64825t=64707
--
FAQ, list
John Hutchison wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old.
She's
5 ft tall and about 100 pounds. She'll eat any cat. Dogs are superior. :)
Dogs naturally love people; cats naturally dislike people and you have to
train them to
, and they generally leave you alone while their
doing that, right?
Just believe me, cats are better...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:50 AM
Subject: Dogs and Cats, Re: OT Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
John Hutchison
Neiberger
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dogs and Cats, Re: OT Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
John Hutchison wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have an Akita dog. (pure bred) She's a year and a couple months old.
She's
5 ft tall and about 100 pounds
Cats are great. Depends what kind of sauce you use thoughJust kidding.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64861t=64707
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Johan Bornman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Yes.
Cisco docs call it a hybrid protocol because it combines some link state
features, yet also has hop count ( distance ) limitations.
Message Posted at:
Hybrid.
Johan Bornman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64718t=64707
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
EIGRP is a hybrid. It can be said that it is a distance vector routing
protocol that acts like a link state routing protocol.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Johan Bornman
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:11 AM
Subject: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or
speaking of NDA...
Dave
Reza wrote:
Hybrid.
Johan Bornman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
I would rather have a German division in front of me
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though. A
hello mechanism and adjacencies does not a link state one make.
Message Posted at:
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
speaking of NDA...
if this is a question directly off the CCIE written it deserves to be
revealed and publicly ridiculed :-
Dave
Reza wrote:
Hybrid.
Johan Bornman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in what way? the hop count is pretty well hidden in the dark interior
and Winding Road
Sent: vrijdag 7 maart 2003 16:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks
At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in
: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in what way? the hop count
I agree completely. I think the whole hybrid was a marketing department
decision. I'm just glad to find out I wasn't the only one who thought this.
scott
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Peter van Oene wrote
My netacad states:
Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64733t=64707
--
FAQ, list
The most correct answer, IMO, is that EIGRP is an enhanced distance vector
protocol. Were I taking a cisco exam though, out of your two choices I'd go
with hybrid.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Bornman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:11 AM
To: [EMAIL
John Hutchison wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My netacad states:
Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols
in none of the Cisco exams I have ever taken has there ever been the more
The Cisco answer is hybrid, but that's a load of bullhocky. EIGRP is a
DV protocol. Cisco marketing likes to call it a hybrid because it has
some features that are also present in link state protocols, but they're
not specifically link state features. EIGRP is NOT a link state
protocol in any
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF and IS-IS, but those have
nothing whatsoever to do with whether protocol is DV or LS. Some people
get hung up
I seem to recall a question on the recert along those lines. I can
pretty much remeber the questions but I am not going to post it. This
post would help one come to the correct conclusion.
Dave
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
speaking
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF and IS-IS, but those
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
the REAL question is which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching? ;-
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave
At 09:30 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
the REAL question is which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching? ;-
I'm working on a draft for ARP switching. Still struggling with
At 9:12 PM + 3/7/03, MADMAN wrote:
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
Dave
While it isn't link state, the DUAL algorithm is completely different
than that of IGRP.
John Neiberger wrote:
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does
works. This is in contrast to RIP which
sends out
an update at specified intervals (30 secs for RIPv1) regardless of
whether a
topology change or not.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707
: John Neiberger
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance
vector. In no way
does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes
neighbor
29 matches
Mail list logo
