gt;> though. If everyone skips
>> off to an alternate backbone service, Will we still
>> keep upgrading the
>> existing (free/mostly free) backbone?
>>
>>
>> Original Message Follows
>> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
r
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Easing Internet backbone
> traffic..thoughts..!
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:23:55 -0700
>
> Sounds like a creative way to optimize traffic
> forwarding o
ntinent to get to a major exchange.
In other words, global routing is still something where you need to
understand the big picture, or involve someone who does.
Original Message Follows
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Easing Internet backbone traffic..thoughts..!
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:23:55 -0700
Sounds like a creative way to optimize traffic forwarding on the Internet.
Seems a
Nigel, InterNAP likes to make a lot of noise on an old concept. Other
companies such as SAVVIS already used this concept, although InterNAP says
that they measure the delays, reliability and maybe a few other things in
order to change their BGP/routing policy.
They definetly have an interesting o
Sounds like a creative way to optimize traffic forwarding on the Internet.
Seems a bit like MPLS, but more real-time.
Locating the company in Seattle is probably a good idea. Not only is Amazon
in Seattle, but maybe they'll get Microsoft as a customer too?
Hopefully some of the gurus will comm
6 matches
Mail list logo
