for consistency's
sake? Well...ummm...errr...ahhhjust document it really well and upgrade
if/when you find the need.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To: EA Louie ;
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933
an identifiable problem. These days, the latest IOS is not necessarily
the best IOS.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
EA Louie
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco
that feed off of the RSP), I was not able to correct the new problem of
needing reboot the router once a week to keep LANE clients established :o)
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 8:54 PM
Subject: RE: FW: Why Cisco
]
Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo
you
Me too. and if I never have to mess with the routers because they're
doing
their job, then why upgrade or futz with them, especially a core router?
I
love
ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
never want the fixes and features of newer code? Just curious... Especialy
with Cisco NAT in it's infant stages...
-Patrick
David Toalson 09/14/01 11:52AM
I work at a subsidiary of a large healthcare company. My
ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
Me too. and if I never have to mess with the routers because they're doing
their job, then why upgrade or futz with them, especially a core router? I
love to tinker just like everyone else, but the great thing about a
6 matches
Mail list logo
