ed because of the establishment
> of a
> circuit, but unreliable because there are no retransmission and
> error
> checking mechanismns.
>
> X25 is connection oriented and reliable.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ""B.J. Wilson&
> But should be different? True for the test and
> untrue in the real-world??
This is an unfortunate and all-too-common occurrence: the discrepancy between
marketing, and how things actually work. Cisco is a victim of it (e.g.
"hybrid" routing protocol), but Microsoft is arguably the worst offen
s connection oriented and reliable.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: ""B.J. Wilson"" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay: connectionless or connection-orie [7:54707]
Well, I tend to look at
But should be different? True for the test and untrue in the real-world??
Just curious!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54714&t=54707
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cis
Well, I tend to look at things from a "global" or "Layer 1 through 7"
perspective: does Frame Relay perform the same functions that TCP does? In
other words, does it perform a check to make sure every single IP packet (or
Frame Relay frame) makes it from the ingress point of the Frame cloud to th
Pre-established path, that is it. It surprises me all this confusing
literature I read.
When I was reading for my CCNA a few months back, I was going through this
thing time and again from a Cisco-Authorized Course, namely, Frame Relay is
connection-oriented because of a pre-established path.
Wh
6 matches
Mail list logo
