There are lots of ISL trunks still working, if it ain't broke... But
yes the direction is dot1q and I have been suggesting customers consider
dot1q on new installs. The original argument, dot1q does not support
per VLAN spanning, is no longer valid.
Dave
Sean Knox wrote:
>
> Is ISL still wid
What are the current advantages for running ISL over 802.1q? I would
expect its proprietary nature to be enough to warrant choosing against it.
Pete
At 03:47 PM 1/30/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Is ISL still widely used? Are there still many shops out there using it? (I
>assume Cisco only outfits)
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33758]
What are the current advantages for running ISL over 802.1q? I would
expect its proprietary na
It might be an issue of installed base, or lack thereof. I believe recent
CatOS releases have corrected this, but for a long while, the Cat 400x
series did ISL on trunks, while doing 802.1q on ports. Older boxes, of
course, may only do ISL.
In these days of tight budgets it can be difficult to co
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33758]
It might be an issue of installed base, or lack thereof. I believe recent
CatOS rel
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: "Peter van Oene"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: How prevalent is ISL in the "real world"? [7:33758]
> What are the current advantages for running IS
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
> William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Chuck Larrieu
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:09 PM
> To: [EMAI
7 matches
Mail list logo
