Listers.
I would like to make some routing changes to a mostly static routing
environment. Currently everything is either routed via default gateway, or
static route statements.
the environment consists of about 30 remote point to point WAN sites, with
most data traffic consisting of IP. We
there has been so many threads and opinions on this, it would probably do
you better to check the archives.
-Patrick
>>> "Bullock, Jason" 01/15/02 04:46PM >>>
Listers.
I would like to make some routing changes to a mostly static routing
environment. Currently everything is either routed via d
why do you think you need to change? seriously? what would dynamic routing
give you that you don't have now - in terms of stability and the like?
it might seem an odd thing to say, but I believe that dynamic routing in
small environments, and maybe even in some larger environments, is over
rated
As I have mentioned before, in this topology I would use EIGRP.
Enable EIGRP on all routers and their perspective networks. At the core
create an access-list permiting only default and distribute this list
out to the remotes. This way everything is learned dynamically but do
not have a full rou
>Listers.
>
>I would like to make some routing changes to a mostly static routing
>environment. Currently everything is either routed via default gateway, or
>static route statements.
>
>the environment consists of about 30 remote point to point WAN sites, with
>most data traffic consisting of I
steve
(don`t flame me too much ...i`m just trying to help)
>From: "MADMAN"
>Reply-To: "MADMAN"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: How would you design a Network ? [7:32067]
>Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:48:31 -0500
>
>As I have mentioned before, in this
"
Kipling, on other wars with different soldiers
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: How would you design a Network ? [7:32067
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How would you design a Network ? [7:32067]
why do you think you need to change? seriously? what would dynamic routing
give you that you don't have now - in terms of stability and the like?
it might seem an odd thing to say, but I believe that dynamic
t;sites from the core. i could have done without the archive crack from
>patrick. ;-)
>
>
>
>jason
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 05:25 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subj
gt;Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: How would you design a Network ? [7:32067] wrap up...
>[7:32174]
>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:12:50 -0500
>
> >thanks for the good feedback from the list and madman, chuck, howard, and
> >stev
nuary 15, 2002 05:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: How would you design a Network ? [7:32067]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> why do you think you need to change? seriously? what would dynamic routing
>
> give you that you don't have now - in terms of stability and the
gt;
>thanks
>
>steve
>
>>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: RE: How would you design a Network ? [7:32067] wrap up...
[7:32174]
>>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:12:50 -0500
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
