RE: IGRP Routes - Classless Networks with Tunnels [7:47415]

Ed What Routing protocol are you using? Mike -Original Message- From: Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 08:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IGRP Routes - Classless Networks with Tunnels [7:47415] How feasible is this, and has anyone tried it? R1 is connected to R2

RE: IGRP Routes - Classless Networks with Tunnels [7:47415]

Ed Sorry, I've just reread the title. Maybe I need more coffee. It's IGRP. Mike -Original Message- From: Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 08:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IGRP Routes - Classless Networks with Tunnels [7:47415] How feasible is this, and has anyo

RE: IGRP Routes - Classless Networks with Tunnels [7:47415]

Ed Here is my understanding of this. The 28 and 29 bit subnets will be auto summarized by one of the 24 bit subnets in your routing table when you are using a 24 bit mask between the two routers. I believe this is the expected operation of IGRP as it is a classfull routing protocol and will auto

Re: IGRP Routes - Classless Networks with Tunnels [7:47415]

Again, R10 is running OSPF and IGRP, with mutual redistribution. R5 is only running IGRP. My goal is to get routes with native subnets (as shown on R10) within the same major subnet into R5. Without summarization. Default network, static routes and policy routing doesn't count either. Keep th