Re: IPX Traceroute [7:43327]

2002-05-05 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
IPX traceroute is somewhat new. Are the other routers running an older version of the IOS by any chance? Priscilla At 04:55 AM 5/5/02, Arjun Das wrote: >Dear Group Members, > >This is my first message please accept apologies >for any mistakes. However, I seek help for the >following proble

Re: IPX Traceroute [7:43327]

2002-05-06 Thread Neru Baba
Hello Priscilla Thank you for 'shining the light'... it might well be 'the right' solution. Router RTR-AL -> IOS is 11.3(11a). Router RTR-3 -> IOS is 12.0(7). I will try to upgrade the IOS to 12.0 at least to see if this problem can be solved. will report the outcome. Kind regards Arju

RE: IPX Traceroute [7:43327]

2002-05-06 Thread Blair, Philip S
If SWITCH1 is a layer two device, then RTR-1 and RTR-3 should be on the same IPX Network (either 1c10 or 1100). Of course I could be misinterupting the ASCII art. Philip -Original Message- From: Arjun Das [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 4:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: IPX Traceroute [7:43327]

2002-05-06 Thread Arjun Das
Hello Priscilla, I upgreaded the IOS of Router RTR_AL, and it worked. However I didn't upgrade the IOS of Router RTR_1. Listed below is the outcome of the 'traceroute ipx' from Router RTR_3. R3# trace ipx 100.000.0c3d.d1eb Tracing the route to 100.000.0c3d.d1eb 0 * * * 1 * * * 2 100.000

RE: IPX Traceroute [7:43327]

2002-05-06 Thread Arjun Das
Hello Philip, Apologies for such 'skewed' ASCII ART, it was not intended that way. A better image (well sort of) is provided at 'http://www.geocities.com/nerubaba/'. Well the problem is now solved, as suggested by Priscilla Oppenheimer - upgrade the IOS to a newer version. Once again a million