Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]

2001-05-23 Thread John Neiberger
It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6 and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray into IPv6 that they would exclude their own routing protocol of choice. John >>> "Chu

RE: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]

2001-05-23 Thread Chuck Larrieu
erger Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602] It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6 and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems o

Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]

2001-05-23 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6 >and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not >to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray >into IPv6 that they would exclude their own routing protocol of choice. > >John Th

RE: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]

2001-05-23 Thread Chuck Larrieu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602] >It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6 >and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not >to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first fo

Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]

2001-05-23 Thread ElephantChild
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > >It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6 > >and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not > >to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray > >into IPv6 that they would