It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6
and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not
to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray
into IPv6 that they would exclude their own routing protocol of choice.
John
>>> "Chu
erger
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]
It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6
and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not
to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems o
>It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6
>and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not
>to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray
>into IPv6 that they would exclude their own routing protocol of choice.
>
>John
Th
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]
>It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6
>and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not
>to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first fo
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6
> >and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not
> >to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray
> >into IPv6 that they would
5 matches
Mail list logo