Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the most common o/s
would be my guess.
-Original Message-
From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]
I've read
es multicast
for the communication.
Let me know.
Edward
-Original Message-
From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]
Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the mo
Mostly it's too slow to be useful. DHCP can tell you about the
default gateway address, and HSRP/VRRP can be much faster to find the
active gateway.
>Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the most common o/s
>would be my guess.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kane, Christop
environment, without cluttering the bandwidth with unecessary IRDP
broadcast/multicast.
CM
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Edward B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 13 June 2001 23:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425
Agreed. IRDP was not natively implemented in common OSs of routers or end
stations. Perhaps if Cisco had defaulted to it being on, like they did with
Proxy ARP, it would have caught on. Also, it does indeed add extra
overhead. A router running IRDP periodically announces itself using a
multica
5 matches
Mail list logo