RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]

2001-06-13 Thread Hire, Ejay
Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the most common o/s would be my guess. -Original Message- From: Kane, Christopher A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425] I've read

RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]

2001-06-13 Thread Kim Edward B
es multicast for the communication. Let me know. Edward -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425] Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the mo

RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]

2001-06-13 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Mostly it's too slow to be useful. DHCP can tell you about the default gateway address, and HSRP/VRRP can be much faster to find the active gateway. >Broadcast intensive and not natively implemented in the most common o/s >would be my guess. > >-Original Message- >From: Kane, Christop

RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]

2001-06-14 Thread Charles Manafa
environment, without cluttering the bandwidth with unecessary IRDP broadcast/multicast. CM > -Original Message- > From: Kim Edward B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 June 2001 23:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425

RE: IRDP, why isn't it used more often [7:8425]

2001-06-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Agreed. IRDP was not natively implemented in common OSs of routers or end stations. Perhaps if Cisco had defaulted to it being on, like they did with Proxy ARP, it would have caught on. Also, it does indeed add extra overhead. A router running IRDP periodically announces itself using a multica