I would go with what works in your lab!!
seriously - try putting 11.3 on both routers, then 12.1 on both, and then
reverse the 11.3/12.1 (so 12.1 on L1 and 11.3 on L2) and see what happens.
I would imagine that you can get away with not enabling CLNS if you have
IS-IS on just a P2P link - maybe n
[...]
> My question is after tried this in my lab, I found even WITHOUT this
> command L1 router still got the L1 0.0.0.0/0 created,
CSCdj06150
--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2512&t=2485
--
FAQ, list archiv
if defined in each router, but I don't think it's related to
this.
Thanks,
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: "andyh"
To: "Jerry Seven" ;
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: IS-IS: Default route for L1 router [7:2485]
> I would go with what
t; Boxster#
>
> I have loopback if defined in each router, but I don't think it's related
to
> this.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "andyh"
> To: "Jerry Seven" ;
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 6:36 PM
> Sub
0030.b636.fe61.00
> >
> > For Boxster:
> > version 12.1
> > clns routing
> > interface GigabitEthernet1/2
> > ip address 118.60.0.1 255.255.0.0
> > ip router isis
> > router isis
> > net 01.00d0.97f2.8c8c.00
> > is-type level-
level 1 areas.
HTH,
-Michael Cohen CCIE #6080
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
aaa aaa
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IS-IS: Default route for L1 router [7:2485]
The adjancencies are formed, here
6 matches
Mail list logo
