Good God Man! Why are you routing VLAN's over a WAN. What is the problem you
are trying to solve???
Z
>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ISL & VLANS between routers
>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:29:05 -0800
>
>Anyone know of a
2 sites, about 10 blocks apart.
VLAN info needs to be routed over the wan because there are members of the
same VLAN in both locations.
"Mask Of Zorro" wrote in message ...
>Good God Man! Why are you routing VLAN's over a WAN. What is the problem
you
>are trying to solve???
>
>Z
>
>
>>From: "Jack
Why not just create a NEW vlan for the remote site
THEN apply whatever policies are necessary to duplicate the access of the
first site?
-Original Message-
From: Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL & V
lding)
not satisfy your requirements?
What are the overall benefits you expect to gain by spanning VLANs over a
WAN?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jack
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL & VLAN
issue, why even implement this?
It may be possible to do it, but why is it a good idea? I mean, I *can*
drink gasoline, but why should I?
Z
>From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: IS
What the customer wants is to group users by the departments they work for
and use VLANs to control access to certain services on the remote site.
I would recommend ACL's but they are set on routing the VLAN info across the
2 sites.
I like the idea of setting up 2 vlans with identical policies on
#x27;t the issue, why even implement this?
>
> It may be possible to do it, but why is it a good
> idea? I mean, I *can*
> drink gasoline, but why should I?
>
> Z
>
> >From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
Probably the best way is to bridge them. Use IRB, create a bridge group for the
VLAN's and you should be in business. You can indeed run them as far apart as you
like. Be aware of the broadcast consequences.
Just a thought.
Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia
On Tuesday, March 13, 200
Juniper supports a feature called CCC (circuit cross connect) which essentially
enables layer two technologies to span across WAN backbones via MPLS. This works with
many layer two encapsulations including ppp, frame, ethernet/802.1q etc. This
technique can provide the type of functionality y
All,
>From the experience I have had in the campus networks,
I have done both ISL/802.1Q over single fiber between
buildings. I have always used a MLS with gigabit
technology for this design. The use of vlans, from my
understanding, is based on broadcast and the use of
being able to centralize man
Sorry, thats acct being located in 3 different
buildings not vlans. My point is the ability to do
configurations etc virtual and centrally versus
physically and distributed.
thanks
--- Peter Van Oene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juniper supports a feature called CCC (circuit cross
> connect) whi
Trunking requires at least 100mb speed.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
> All,
> From the experience I have had in the campus networ
Your point is valid, however the original posted indicated that they needed to extend
the broadcast domain over a wide area network and hoped to do it using 802.1q. Point
to Point fiber, even though it may be long in some cases, doesn't infer the same
characteristics as an IP WAN.
Pete
---
> From: Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
>
>
> > All,
> > From the experience I have had in the campus networks,
> > I have done both
Go take another look at your setup...
- Original Message -
From: Gareth Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
> You sure it can't be done
001 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL & VLANS between routers
You sure it can't be done at 10Mb?
Pretty sure I've done it at 10Mb.
""Groupstudy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P
gt; wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Trunking requires at least 100mb speed.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Mike Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
17 matches
Mail list logo
