Re: Re: LLQ Configuration [7:36272]

2002-02-26 Thread John Neiberger
> You create a Class-map here called "match-all video" > > > > > Policy-map video-police > > class video > > priority 540 > > class class-default > > fair-queue 64 > > Yet you apply a class-map called video here, should you be using > "match-all > video"?? > When configuring a class map you c

Re: LLQ Configuration [7:36272]

2002-02-26 Thread Hunt Lee
Steve, I'm not sure if there is a typo on your config, please see in-line... Lee ""Steve Manuel"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > To Group: > > I am working with a client who is having problems with Video Conference > using Polycom Equipment. The problem is jit

RE: LLQ Configuration [7:36272]

2002-02-22 Thread Mike Bernico
I've done lot's of LLQ but never with FR. My bet however, would be than you can do LLQ on the int, for FRTS, but not both. Mike --- Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 > -Original Message--

Re: LLQ Configuration [7:36272]

2002-02-22 Thread John Neiberger
Strangely enough, we're using LLQ to support video conferencing with Polycomm equipment. However, I don't really have any idea why you're getting that error. What routers are you using? About the only difference I can think of between our implementations is that we're setting the IP Precendenc

Re: LLQ Configuration [7:36272]

2002-02-22 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I'm guessig you have the bandwidth statement set to 768 on the serial interface. If so, type max-reserved-bandwidth 90 on the serial interface. Show us the stats for s0/0 when you do sh int s0/0. ""Steve Manuel"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > To Group: > > I am