What is the real address, I understand if your reticent to provide it
but is it part of a larger CIDR block from the other provider? If so
and the satellite provider is announcing a more specific /24 then all
traffic will come over the satellite link.
there is much info missing to really help
Most of the traffic is arriving via the provider your
doing BGP with and is via this one block of ip with a
/24 e.g 1.1.1.0/24
I am seeing almost 100% utilisation via the satellite
down-link (1st provider running BGP) and very minimum
traffic at the second provider( terrestrial) running
default
gt; Troll Alert
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Farhan Ahmed"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:30 PM
> > Subject: RE: Load Balancing using BGP challenge
> > problem [7:19339]
> >
> >
> > > then u
A prepend will surely influence the inbound traffic. Is most of your
traffic currently arriving via the provider your doing BGP with? What
exactly are you seeing?? Why are you even doing BGP with a private AS
that is incoming only?? With the info you provided it's hard to give a
good answer.
do you think having them change private AS to public
AS number then do AS-PREPEND will be able to do some
kind of influencing?
regards,
suaveguru
--- MADMAN wrote:
>
> You have no way of influencing via BGP the inbound
> routes since your
> using a private AS on one link and default on the
>
what do you mean by this?
--- Brian wrote:
> Troll Alert
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Farhan Ahmed"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:30 PM
> Subject: RE: Load Balancing using BGP challenge
> problem [7:19339]
>
>
> > t
You have no way of influencing via BGP the inbound routes since your
using a private AS on one link and default on the other. You need to
work with your providers if you wish to have incoming traffic to your
network influenced one way or the other.
suaveguru wrote:
>
> hi all
>
> I have been c
I can't put static routes because one provider is
down-link only and the other is two-way
regards,
suaveguru
--- Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> then u should think abt running 2 static routes
> and forget abt bgp cuz its really doesnt exsist
>
> -Original Message-
> From: suaveguru [mailto:[EM
Troll Alert
- Original Message -
From: "Farhan Ahmed"
To:
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:30 PM
Subject: RE: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
> then u should think abt running 2 static routes
> and forget abt bgp cuz its really doesnt exsist
&
then u should think abt running 2 static routes
and forget abt bgp cuz its really doesnt exsist
-Original Message-
From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Load Balancing using BGP challenge problem [7:19339]
hi
10 matches
Mail list logo
