Re: Microsoft Networking over WAN

2000-06-30 Thread Jason Lewis
Would you also need port 135 for RPC? I'm not sure, but everything with NT seems to be RPC-based. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 1:30 PM Subject: RE: Microsoft Networki

RE: Microsoft Networking over WAN

2000-06-30 Thread Jeff Groesbeck
PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Microsoft Networking over WAN Be careful with those ports. They are easily exploitable in the MS environment. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 2:31 PM To: [E

RE: Microsoft Networking over WAN

2000-06-30 Thread Chris Larson
Be careful with those ports. They are easily exploitable in the MS environment. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 2:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Microsoft Networking over WAN TCP 137 UDP

RE: Microsoft Networking over WAN

2000-06-29 Thread Padhu
TCP 137 UDP 138 TCP 139 would be required for ms networking you may also need ip helper-address and ip forward protocol udp if you are doing DHCP across the wan. Cheers,Padhu -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 1:18 PM To: Ci