6, Null0
>>D 192.168.254.0/30 [90/2681856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:35, Serial1
>>C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>>C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
>>C192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback3
>>Router#
>&g
It might be helpful to know that with later IOSs, you can cause OSPF
to advertise loopbacks with their configured mask instead of as a host route
if you add the command ip ospf network point-to-point under the loopback
interface configuration. With ip ospf network point-to-point, the /32 will no
i swear that I read somewhere (possibly in Ivan Pepelnjak's EIGRP n/w design
sol'ns) that you can re-distribute osfp>eigrp or vice versa, but using some
sort of filter/distribute list command in the routing process, to define the
cost/admin distance of the imported routes between routing processes
, CCIE Candidate It's Not Dagon"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject: RE: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF - Bad News!
The decision process for putting a route in the table is (roughly from my
poor memory so correct at will) is:
1
>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF - Bad News!
>Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:27:26 -0500 (CDT)
>
>
>The /32's are those the loopbacks?
>
>raising the EIGRP AD should work, it may take some time for the route to
>be invalidated tho
192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback3
> Router#
> Router#
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Cthulu, CCIE Candidate It's Not Dagon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
/24 is a summary, 23:15:36, Null0
>D 192.168.254.0/30 [90/2681856] via 192.168.254.5, 23:15:35, Serial1
>C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>C192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
>C192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback3
>Router#
>
168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
> C192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback3
> Router#
> Router#
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Cthulu, CCIE Candidate It's Not Dagon
> Sent: Tue
ent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF
Hey, Brian,
Thanks for the info. I have some comments/clarification.
>EIGRP carries a lower administrative distance vs. EIGRP.
CR: You mean EI
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Cthulu, CCIE Candidate It's Not Dagon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF
>
> Hey, Brian
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Cthulu, CCIE Candidate It's Not Dagon
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF
Hey, Brian,
Thanks for the info. I have som
Hey, Brian,
Thanks for the info. I have some comments/clarification.
>EIGRP carries a lower administrative distance vs. EIGRP.
CR: You mean EIGRP (90) has a lower AD than OSPF (110)?
So you can
>basically turn up OSPF on your routers, and then when it all looks kosher,
>what I would do is r
12 matches
Mail list logo
